|
Watch Video
Scriptures
Blue Letter Bible
Book Recommendation...
Who's Your Daddy?
The Great Dinosaur
Hunt
Did you ever want to dig up a
T.Rex?
Well here is your chance.
Read all about it right here and you might just win this amazing
T.Rex fossil replica.
JOIN THE
HUNT
Juvenile T.Rex fossil replica is ~
4 ft long and 3ft tall
Help support ProGenesis.org. |
|
Thimble Apologetics
By
Dennis Flanders
"And
God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and
cattle after their kind, and every thing that
creepeth- upon the earth after his kind-: and- God
saw that it was good."
GENESIS
1:25 KJV
Genetically speaking
The belief that mutations
could slowly change one type of animal into a
completely different type of animal is analogous to
believing that you could change a black and white
television into a jet airplane by throwing rocks at
it. The rocks will definitely produce change but
they will never produce an I Improved television, a
color television, or a television that is
slowly being
transformed into a jet airplane. Even if jet
airplane parts were thrown at the television, the
complexity required to change the television Into
something else would not allow it to happen.
Mutations cause a loss of information and do not
explain where the information which is already
present originated.
This is a fact of science
regardless of how many rocks are thrown. Evolution
relies on billions of years to explain the
transformation of life.
But even if
zillions of rocks are thrown at trillions of
televisions for billions of years, not a single
improved television will result. In the same way,
mutations . Will produce changes, but they will
never enable one· type of creature to turn into a
completely different type.
For that to happen, useful information would
have to be added to the
DNA of the creature. This simply does not happen as
a result of random mutations.
It is
easy to see that two creatures of the Canine type
could have been bred from the wolf to the Chihuahua
over time.
But it is not possible to imagine that a
breeder could start with a pair of Chihuahuas and
eventually breed a wolf.
All mutations involve a loss of information.
Science cannot produce a single mutation that
demonstrates gain in even the smallest amount of
genetic information.
Yet we are expected to believe that over long
periods of time and random chance a simple one cell
creature evolved into a man.
SEARCH FOR THE TRUTH
Schedule an Event
Accident or
Creation?
"For you created
my inmost being;
you knit me
together in my
mother's womb.
"I praise you
because I am
fearfully and
wonderfully
made; your works
are wonderful, I
know that full
well."
Psalm 139:12-14
"The fact of
evolution is the
backbone of biology, and
biology is thus in the
peculiar position of
being a science founded
on an unproved theory -
is it then a science or
a faith? Belief in the
theory of evolution is
thus exactly parallel to
belief in special
creation - both are
concepts which believers
know to be true but
neither, up to the
present, has been
capable of proof"
- Introduction to The
Origin of Species
(London: J.M. Dent &
Sons, Ltd., 1971)
|
|
Public Schools Perpetuate
LIES
There is a growing war between Creation
believers and Evolutionists. Every day creation science becomes
stronger and evolutionism grows weaker. The Creation believer
starts with the worldview founded in the belief that the Bible
is the infallible word of God. This position is anchored in the
belief that God created the earth is six literal days as written
about in Genesis. Creationism also believes that the scientific
evidence better supports the creation point of view and tends to
disprove evolutionism. Creationists also reject the
evolutionist position that the universe is billions of years
old.
Creation and Science
Most branches of modern science were
founded by believers in creation. The list of creationist
scientists is impressive. A sample: Physics: Newton, Faraday,
Maxwell, Kelvin. Chemistry: Boyle, Dalton, Ramsay. Biology: Ray,
Linnaeus, Mendel, Pasteur, Virchow, Agassiz. Geology: Steno,
Woodward, Brewster, Buckland, Cuvier. Astronomy: Copernicus,
Galileo, Kepler, Herschel, Maunder. Mathematics: Pascal, and
Leibnitz.
Even today, many scientists reject particles-to-people
evolution (i.e. everything made itself). The staff scientists
working at the Creation Science Foundation have published many
scientific papers in their own fields. Dr Russell Humphreys, a
nuclear physicist working with Sandia National Laboratories in
Albuquerque, New Mexico, has over 20 articles in physics
journals, while Dr John Baumgardner's catastrophic plate
tectonics theory was published in Nature. Dr Edward Boudreaux of
the University of New Orleans has published 26 articles and four
books in physical chemistry. Dr Maciej Giertych, Head of the
Department of Genetics at the Institute of Dendrology of the
Polish Academy of Sciences, has published 90 papers in
scientific journals. Dr Aw Swee-Eng was Associate Professor of
Biochemistry at the University of Singapore, and is now Head of
the Department of Nuclear Medicine and Director of Clinical
Research at Singapore General Hospital. So an oft-repeated
charge that no real scientist rejects evolution is completely
without foundation.
The best argument that there is a
GOD - and it often moved me deeply - is this one that he
proves from generation of species: a cow always bears a cow,
a horse a horse, etc. No goldfinch produces a siskin.
Therefore it is necessary to conclude that there is
something that directs everything thus. ---Martin Luther
(350 yrs. before Darwin).
Read More about
Creation vs Evolution...
50 Reasons to
Leave Evolution as a Faith
Inside ProGenesis News
Get Adobe 8 Reader FREE
Files marked with this icon may be downloaded by right-clicking
and selecting "save target as" option.
Join our New Forums
Be sure to join our Creation Forums.
This is a chance to interact with others and express your
opinions.
 JOIN US NOW
Watch for me at the end of an
article! Click on me when you see me! It means that
you can speak your mind on topics I appear by.
Tell us what you think!
|
